Center for Empirical Legal Studies
A major criticism of today's legal scholarship, as exemplified by the types of articles that appear in law reviews and journals across the country, is that there is a lack of scholarship of practical value to practitioners and policymakers. The Wake Forest Law Review seeks to help fill this void by promoting student involvement in the assembly and analysis of data related to the operation of legal systems and legal rules. To that end, the Wake Forest Law Review is proud to present empirical studies and related data sets compiled by its student members.
2007
Whitney S. Waldenberg and Sarah E. Wallace
42 Wake Forest L. Rev. 303
2006
Flora Chan and Jennifer Erickson
41 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1297
Jennifer B. Lawrence and Jackson W. Prentice
41 Wake Forest L. Rev. 913
Jason M. Loring and C. Keith Taylor
41 Wake Forest L. Rev. 321
2005
Jason M. Loring and Liam R. Roth
40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1441
Devon J. Green and Megan S. Shafer
40 Wake Forest L. Rev. 727
2004
Is Midnight Nearing for Cinderella? Corporate America Faces Reality with Stock Option Accountability
Melissa A. Chiprich and Phillip J. Long
39 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1033
2003
Effects of the Shift in the Burden of Proof in the Disposition of Tax Cases
John R. Gardner and Benjamin R. Norman
38 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1357
